Juridical Analysis of the Postponement of Execution of Inherited Land Due to Error in Objecto in Supreme Court Decision Number 204 K/Pdt/2019
English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70471/w7e4tm20Keywords:
Error in Objecto, Execution of Inherited Land, Legal Certainty, Supreme Court Decision , GovernmentAbstract
This study examines the juridical and non-juridical obstacles to the execution of court decisions in land inheritance disputes, focusing on error in objecto as highlighted in Supreme Court Decision Number 204 K/Pdt/2019. The case involved a geographical misidentification of the disputed object, which significantly delayed the execution process and hindered the enforcement of the court's ruling. Employing a normative juridical approach, this research utilizes statutory, case, and document analysis to explore the underlying issues. The findings reveal that the primary factors obstructing execution include error in objecto, objections from the judgment debtor, incompetence among law enforcement officers, lack of coordination and support from local government authorities, and the financial burden associated with the execution process. These challenges not only undermine the principle of legal certainty but also perpetuate substantive injustice for litigants. To address these issues, the study proposes preventive measures such as optimizing local inspections (descente), leveraging geospatial technology, and enforcing stricter standards against ambiguous lawsuits (obscuur libel). Corrective measures include the use of judicial review, Supreme Court advisory opinions, and sanctions for negligent judicial officers. By implementing these recommendations, the judiciary can enhance the effectiveness and enforceability of its decisions, ensuring greater legal certainty and fairness in land dispute resolutions.
Downloads
References
Bungaran, S. (2006). Kedudukan Tanah dalam Masyarakat Adat Batak. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Chandra, T. (2019). Non-Litigation Process Land Dispute Settlement for Legal Certainty. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 2(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v2i2.49 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v2i2.49
Constitutional Court of Indonesia. (2024). Object error in heads of region domicile requirement review. Retrieved from https://en.mkri.id/news/details/2024-10-31/Object_Error_in_Heads_of_Region_Domicile_Requirement_Review
Daim, N. A., Bayuaji, R., & Abadi, S. (2024). Criminalizing non-compliance with civil execution orders: A strategy for enhancing legal certainty and business efficiency. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 13(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.13.2.2024.251-270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.13.2.2024.337-364
Gayo, A. A. (2020). Problematic in the Civil Decision Execution Process in Indonesia in Order to Realize Court Excellence. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah, 12(3), 553–570. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V12.553-570
Hakim, L. (2019). Legal barriers to the execution of civil case judgments in Indonesia. Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah, 10(2), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v10i2.5592
Handayani, N., & Santoso, H. (2018). Issues in the enforceability of civil case judgments due to discrepancies in object identification. Verstek: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 7(1), 45–59. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/verstek/article/download/39143/25819
Harahap, Y. (2020). The problematics of execution law against non-executable judgments and the reform of execution law in Indonesia. Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah, 11(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v11i2.5592
Hapsari, H. I. (2018). Studi Putusan yang Tidak Dapat Dieksekusi (Non Eksekutable) dalam Perkara Perdata (Studi Putusan Nomor 16/Pdt.Plw/2014/PN.Kdl). Jurnal Verstek, 6(2), 1–15. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/verstek/article/view/39143
Hirano, T., & Toda, A. A. (2023). Overvaluation of land and unbalanced growth: A theory of economic development. arXiv. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00349
Hilman, A. (2005). Hukum Adat dan Perannya dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.
Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83–119. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70
Nurwiyanti, D. S. (2021). Dissenting opinion hakim terkait eksepsi error in objecto dalam sengketa tanah (Tinjauan yuridis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tamiang Layang Nomor 8/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Tml). Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 10(1), 45–60. Retrieved from https://repository.unsoed.ac.id/9611/
Purnama, D., & Khasanah, D. D. (2024). The Role of The National Land Agency in Preventing and Setting Land Disputes in Indonesia. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(4), 943–954. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.543
Retno Wulan Sutantio & Iskandar Oeripkartawinata. (n.d.). Proses Eksekusi dalam Hukum Acara Perdata. Bandung: Alumni.
Sembiring, A. N. (2024). Legal certainty of land rights due to the execution of court rulings. Hangoluan Law Review, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V12.553-570
Siregar, A. M. (2019). Legal certainty and judicial responsibility: An analysis of disputed object clarity in civil cases. Indonesian Law Journal, 18(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.25077/ilj.2019.37
Sriram, C. L. (2007). Justice as peace? Liberal peacebuilding and strategies of transitional justice. Global Society, 21(4), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820701562843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820701562843
Subekti, R. (1987). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Susantio, R., & Oeripkartawinata, I. (1997). Hukum acara perdata dalam teori dan praktek (Cet. 8). Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Wayan, I. (1991). Konflik Pertanahan dalam Perspektif Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Yahya Harahap, M. (2008). Hukum Acara Perdata
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ewis Debby Parhusip, Muhammad Yamin, Mulhadi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
